The 2026 Candidate Tracker

What the 2026 candidates say — and what the members among them do

Every commitment in this tracker is quoted verbatim from the candidate's own campaign site, from a dated, hashed capture with an independent archive copy — no paraphrase, no characterization. Where the candidate already serves in Congress, their official record (cosponsorships and key votes, every mark source-linked) sits beside their promises, pillar by pillar. Whether the record matches the promise is a judgment the tracker deliberately leaves to you.

The promise view of the accountability suite: the Tracker follows the bills, the Forces the players who move them, the Scorecard how members vote, and the Candidate Tracker what 2026 candidates promise.

20 candidates 644 commitments captured 436 forward promises 11 with a congressional record

Coverage note: the tracker currently follows high-profile 2026 races only — the competitive tier of the Senate map plus the most competitive House districts — and lists a candidate only once their campaign site publishes substantive positions. Coverage widens as races are worked; absence here is a coverage gap, not a judgment.

20 candidates

How this was built — and what it does not claim

Roster: FEC filings define who counts as a candidate; coverage is the competitive tier of the 2026 Senate map (plus a House seed), not every filer. A candidate's absence means their site had no substantive issues content at capture time or they haven't been worked yet — not an editorial judgment.
Capture: campaign pages were crawled 2026-08-07 – 2026-08-07, hashed (SHA-256), and submitted to the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine, so every quote is checkable against a copy this project does not control.
Extraction: commitments were proposed by a language model and kept only if the quote exists verbatim in the stored capture — anything that failed that mechanical check was discarded. Type labels (promise = forward-looking · record = claim about past action · value = belief without a falsifiable commitment) are editorial classifications, independently audited and human-reviewed.
Record: for sitting members, marks come from official Congress.gov cosponsor lists and House/Senate roll-call XML — the same data as the Accountability Scorecard. Candidates without current federal office show no record column: the tracker does not reconstruct past-office records.
Alignment marks: “aligns with platform” and “conflicts with platform” are editorial assessments against the platform's published ask catalog — a mark requires a specific cited ask, the same standard applies to every party, and most commitments carry no mark because the platform takes no position on their subject. ✓/✗ counts on each row summarize these.
No matching verdicts: promises and record rows share a pillar, nothing more. The tracker never asserts that a specific vote fulfills or breaks a specific promise, and an alignment mark is about the promise's direction — not a claim that the candidate will keep it.